Warlords
Making War and Loving It
By Dale "Deiru" CulpSeptember 4, 2003
I stand here today, atop my battlements, and cry, "WAR!" for that is all that I am left to. For me, nothing less than victory will do. If need be, I shall destroy you all. Your slings and arrows cannot harm me for my fortress is mighty and endures your impotent attacks. And if death be my end? Then I embrace my fate! But know this...Death shall not have an easy take of me; my fight is until the very end!
Few games can inspire such words; fewer games can live up to them. Warlords for the Atari 2600 was, indeed, one such game.
Think of it as a deathmatch version of Breakout. Each player takes one corner and must defend it while attacking the other 3 corners. A fireball is left to freely roam the screen, bouncing off walls, your castle, and your shield. If it hits your castle, it'll cause a bit of destruction, breaking one "brick" at a time until it gets through and exposes your "crown". If the crown is hit, you are eliminated… you'll want to avoid that if you have any hopes of winning the game.
The game continues in this manner until the last man (or woman, as the case may be) is left standing. After a few rounds of this, the total number of wins is calculated and the winner is announced... pray it's you. The velocity of the fireball is variable, depending on what it collides with. The darker, inner "bricks" of your castle cause the fireball to bounce and fly at a faster rate; lighter, outer "bricks" slow it down. The velocity of the fireball remains unchanged when colliding with shields and the wall of the playfield with one minor exception… by holding down the button, you can "catch" the fireball with your shield. Releasing the button causes the fireball to fly out at its maximum velocity. This feature is only available in certain game types, which I will discuss at length.
There are various game types and styles of play that you can select depending on the number of players and the difficulty you wish the AI players to play at. In some game modes, the shields cannot "catch" the fireball, adding a twist to the game. In one of the more memorable game types, one player controls two shields at a time. In this mode, the selection of shields is limited to the two left and two right shields. This opens up new styles of play and allows for a difference in your attacks. If one castle becomes obliterated, that shield is lost. It's a terrible loss, but not a devastating one as you're not out of the game just yet. If you can manage doing this to your opponent, you will find him at a distinct disadvantage, but not a total disadvantage. Depending on your opponent's skill, he may just end up turning the tables and obliterating you instead. The only thing I dislike about this play mode is the lack of Al to support computerized opponents. It's strictly 2-player only, which is unfortunate since it's quite a fun way to play.
These extra play modes were, if I recall correctly, not available in the arcade version of this game, so it's nice to see Atari adding some new twists and keeping the game fresh. What's missing from this version, however, is the addition of extra fireballs. Over time, in the arcade version, additional fireballs would spawn, making the game even more hectic. Also, eliminating an opponent adds one extra fireball. The game can reach levels of insanity as more and more fireballs go bouncing all over the screen. I'm not sure what argument caused this decision to be made, but it would have been a welcome extra play mode.
The AI is quite good on advanced settings while quite stupid on lower settings. Being the only real person laying can be a nightmare if you're taken out first as the other three opponents can end up bouncing the fireball back and forth for hours, never getting a hit, never finishing the round. Other than that, they can end up providing a good deal of challenge.
Capable of catering to four players at once, the bitter struggles for power were usually legendary. Friends and foes were quickly forged and later dissolved. The rooting out of personalities would make this game a psychologists dream. One by one, your well-meaning siblings and best friends would turn on you, some building alliances with you, some building against
you..
- The Backstabber
- This guy shows up, all smiles. You see him above, perhaps across from you, rarely diagonal to you. When the heat of the action kicks in, he does well to avoid hitting your castle, even apologizes when he does. He whispers into your ear, cunningly, "Let's work together to take these other guys out." You agree, foolishly. As the other two players fall, suddenly, a hideous transformation occurs... The Backstabber shows his true colors, and all hell breaks loose. He's watched your castle take damage; he's memorized your play style and analyzed it for weaknesses. He knows what it's going to take to take you down and, if he can, he will. Most likely, you'll never trust him again, but a lesson learned is a lesson taught. You'll have plenty of opportunity to exact your revenge in later rounds.
- The God of War - This guy is unstoppable, or at least thinks he is. Before the game even starts he's already doing victory dances and describing the many unpleasant things he will do with your skull, which he shall claim as a trophy. Providing he has the talent, the skills, and the luck to back up his words, he'll be a worthy adversary. Just be wary of what happens when he finally does go down... it won't be pretty.
- The Weakling - Fodder to the God of War, this guy goes down quickly and easily. He accepts his fate, knows full well that he's no match for any of you, and bows out gracefully when he's had enough. From a strategic viewpoint, he is most beneficial as a distraction. Depending on how susceptible your friends are to resorting to low blows and cheap shots, they'll most likely focus their efforts on annihilating the Weakling first, completely unaware of the massive attack you will bring from behind. The Weakling poses no threat, use this to your advantage. He is the easiest to trick and makes treaty with the Backstabber without any question. Even after the Backstabber makes his move, the Weakling still doesn't get it... he just assumes he was killed by accident and falls for the ploy again and again. He gladly lays down his life to help his teammates, no matter their motives and schemes against him. After all, he assumes it's just a matter of time before he's dead anyway... why put up a fight?
- The Strategist - Polar opposite to the God of War, the Strategist is calm, patient. He watches the game unfold, defends himself deftly and takes careful aim before delivering each blow. He's not slow, but is quite aware of the dangers posed by haste. He plays sides when it benefits him, isn't easily tricked, and learns from his mistakes. In team games, you'll want him on your side… but be aware; he may not always want you. If he sees you as a weakness he won't hesitate to let you go. It's all just a part of his plan...
These various personalities would surface and submerge depending on the situation. It makes for a really good time, in the end. Many, many Saturday afternoons were spent enjoying this game after a morning of sugar coated cereals action-packed cartoons, and I think you can see why. Even today, many can appreciate this game.
The graphics are comparable to its arcade counter-part, perhaps not nearly as detailed, but they more than make up that by providing the same fast-paced gameplay along with additional features to keep things fresh. The only major, noticeable difference is the lack of a dragon to introduce the fireball. Also, it doesn't look much like a fireball, really more of a flashy square. Still, it gets the job done.
There's no music and the sound isn't that hot. When the fireball collides with a shield you get this rubbery "bounce" sound that conveys the idea quite nicely, while a loud crunch accompanies a "brick" being broken. The sound and light show produced when the
fireball hits a "crown" is explosive, violent, and loud.. exactly what you'd expect, but that's about it.
Gameplay is, obviously, near perfect when you've got a number of friends over. The AI, as I said, is quite good, but nowhere near impossible and gets old after a while, simply incapable of providing much of a challenge once you've got the hang of it. The AI can surprise you every now and then, slipping a shot in while you're not paying attention, but not terribly great when compared to an all out brawl with real, human players.
Overall, this game is well worth it. It shows just how a simple concept can end up being a terrific game. I highly recommend it.
Game Data |
Scores
|
| Title |
Warlords |
Graphics |
70% |
| Publisher |
Atari |
Sound/Music |
40% |
| Genre |
Action |
Gameplay |
80% |
| System |
2600 |
Control |
100% |
|
|
Overall |
85% |
)
)
)
